The recent case [1] of a battered British
woman made headlines; her lover broke her jaw and nose, then her eyes were
gouged out - it sounds like a horror flick. Only the bare facts got reported,
as if it was just an isolated incident; there was very little analysis given in
the media. There was hardly any mention of the man’s background, his ethnicity
or religion, and no mention if he had any ideological affiliation, and nothing
to indicate how widespread domestic violence is in the UK.
Media analysis is often tacit; by
dropping hints of religious or ethnic background of the perpetrator, and
selectively citing out other similar cases it paints a general picture, indicating
the source of the problem. For sure, that
would have been the case, had the man been of a foreign complexion with a name
like Ahmed, instead of Shane; the Islamophobes and closet racists would have
argued that this wife-beating episode is another example proving that it is an Islamic
phenomenon. Such Melanie Phillips like analysis usually gets endorsed by nasty
comments found below it.
Domestic violence is almost universal;
it is just as prevalent, if not more, in countries that claim to be
spearheading women’s rights. It is amusing to see countries like the US raising
such issues, whilst it’s blind to the rapists filling the ranks of its army [2]
and homes. In a survey [3], two-thirds of teenage men said they would commit
date-rape if they could get away with it. Yet these types of men were sent to Afghanistan and Iraq to liberate women!